Iran General NewsU.S. considers opening a diplomatic post in Iran

U.S. considers opening a diplomatic post in Iran

-

ImageNew York Times: The Bush administration is considering establishing an American diplomatic presence in Iran for the first time since relations were severed during the 444-day occupation of the American Embassy in Tehran nearly three decades ago, European and American officials said on Thursday.

The New York Times
 
By ELAINE SCIOLINO and SHERYL GAY STOLBERG
Published: July 18, 2008

ImagePARIS — The Bush administration is considering establishing an American diplomatic presence in Iran for the first time since relations were severed during the 444-day occupation of the American Embassy in Tehran nearly three decades ago, European and American officials said on Thursday.

The idea would be to establish a so-called interests section, rather than a fully staffed embassy, with American diplomats who could issue visas to Iranians seeking to visit the United States. But the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity under diplomatic rules, cautioned that the idea had not been approved by the White House and could be delayed or blocked by opposition within the administration.

The proposal comes as the White House is adopting new tactics in dealing with Iran. With six months left in office, Mr. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice appear to be looking for new ways to reach out to the Iranian people as the administration tries to bring a peaceful resolution to the impasse over Iran’s nuclear program.

On Saturday, William J. Burns, the State Department’s third-ranking official, is to arrive in Geneva to participate, along with European Union nations, in talks with Iran aimed at persuading it to suspend uranium enrichment in exchange for economic and political incentives. The talks are a first. A department spokesman, Sean McCormack, said on Thursday that an interests section would not be discussed.

One senior European official said that Mr. Burns, the under secretary of state for political affairs, had told a number of his counterparts in Tokyo in recent weeks that Ms. Rice was committed to moving forward on the decision to put American diplomats in Tehran, but that the decision still faced opposition from conservatives.

“My feeling is that the decision was more or less taken and the administration’s problem was when and how to announce it,” the official said. “They want to do it, but for domestic political reasons they don’t know how and when, and maybe even if, they can do it.”

In Washington on Thursday, the White House and State Department declined to comment, saying they would not discuss internal deliberations. But they did not discount reports that the idea was under consideration.

“We are always looking for ways to engage the people of Iran more, make it easier for them to get visas,” said Gordon D. Johndroe, the deputy White House press secretary.

Iran, for its part, seems to have embraced the idea of a higher American diplomatic presence.

“We welcome any move which would expand human relations,” President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said on state television this week.

But when Manouchehr Mottaki, the foreign minister, was asked about the idea during a news conference in Damascus, Syria, he pointed out, “The request of the United States has been made via the media in a nonofficial fashion.”

Mr. Bush has long said he has no complaint with the Iranian people. His issue, he has said, is with the Iranian government. Ms. Rice echoed that sentiment last week in an interview with the Persian-language service of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. She said no final decision had been made on an interests section, “but we are looking for ways that Iranians can have access to the United States.”

There is a small interests section in Tehran administered by the Swiss, who represent American interests in Iran. The Swiss do not have the authority to grant United States visas. Last week, Mr. Burns testified before Congress and was asked about the possibility of establishing an interests section. He seemed to suggest it was under consideration.

He said the idea “is an interesting one, and it’s one that’s worth looking at carefully.”

Latest news

Iran’s Regime Has Nothing To Offer but Weakness

In recent years the weaknesses of Iran’s regime have become more transparent every day. From its weakness in the...

Iran Regime’s Bad Situation in Iraq

“One damn thing after another.” This is what the Iranian regime is facing at an increasing tendency. The miserable...

Iran Regime’s Biological Weapon: The Coronavirus

The coronavirus situation in Iran is a long time out of control and the regime not only does not...

Iran Regime’s Solution To Prevent the Expansion of Protests: National Internet

Statements by Ahmad Khatami, a member of the Iranian regime’s Assembly of Experts on cyberspace and the new government's...

Why the Iranian Economy Is in Tatters

Iranian Foreign Affairs Commentator and research analyst Cyrus Yaqubi have written an op-ed about the Iranian economy, where he...

Raisi’s Execution Tactics Exposed

Ebrahim Raisi will become president of Iran in just over a week, even though (or perhaps, because) his resume...

Must read

American Appeasement of Iran Is Over

Iran Focus London, 19 Dec - Many are concerned...

Iran’s Majlis Speaker hails Lebanon’s “Islamic resistance”

Iran Focus: Tehran, Iran, Jun. 27 - Iran's Majlis...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you