Iran Nuclear NewsU.S., in shift, will slow push for U.N. action...

U.S., in shift, will slow push for U.N. action against Iran

-

Wall Street Journal: With Russia and China balking, the U.S. and its allies will slow their push for U.N. Security Council action against Iran and develop a new list of incentives and punishments intended to persuade Tehran to curtail its nuclear program.
The Wall Street Journal

Pressure From Russia, China Forces White House to Try Carrot-and-Stick Approach

By CARLA ANNE ROBBINS
May 10, 2006; Page A7

WASHINGTON — With Russia and China balking, the U.S. and its allies will slow their push for U.N. Security Council action against Iran and develop a new list of incentives and punishments intended to persuade Tehran to curtail its nuclear program.

Speaking privately yesterday, U.S. and European officials acknowledged there is little hope that a new offer, to be developed by the Europeans, will alter Iran’s behavior. But they said it may be the only way to get Russia and China to agree to impose sanctions should Iran continue to defy the council over demands that it halt enriching uranium, which is usable for nuclear fuel or potentially a nuclear weapon.

The change of tactics drew private grumbling from some parts of the Bush administration, where hard-line officials had argued for forcing Russia’s and China’s hands with a swift vote on a toughly worded resolution at the Security Council.

The new path, first proposed by the British in March, requires the U.S. to align itself more explicitly with a set of incentives for Iran — something President Bush has resisted until now. And it will almost certainly give Tehran more time to perfect its nuclear skills.

Diplomats said the “carrots” would likely focus on guaranteeing Tehran access to civilian nuclear technology, while the “sticks” would be a progression of bans on trade with Iran’s nuclear and military industries; travel restrictions for Iranian officials involved in those efforts; and a freeze on certain government assets.

It isn’t clear whether Tehran is interested in bargaining, having rejected a European offer last summer that included pledges of cooperation in the nuclear-energy field, and other economic and technical cooperation. “The significant difference,” one diplomat said, is that this offer would come with the backing of the U.S., Russia and China and would have an explicit threat of punishment attached. “This would underline the seriousness of Iran’s choice: integration or isolation.”

U.S. and European officials have been pressing for passage of a so-called Chapter VII resolution ordering Tehran to suspend its production of enriched uranium.

U.S. and European officials had hoped to bring Russia and China onboard. But at a Monday night dinner in New York, hosted by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was adamant that Russia would fiercely oppose a Chapter VII resolution that could open the door to economic sanctions or potential military action.

Ms. Rice and her top aides, who had opposed the British idea six weeks ago, apparently decided that they had little choice but to shift course. Ms. Rice said yesterday that the U.S. is ready “to take the time” to develop a common strategy on Iran but insisted that the Security Council must still send a strong message that the Iranians'”behavior to date is unacceptable, and that they need to return to the negotiating table.”

U.S. officials said they would continue to push for a Chapter VII resolution to precede, or at least coincide with, the new offer. European officials suggested that the offer would almost certainly come before any Security Council vote.

Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said yesterday that he is waiting for a reaction after sending an 18-page letter to President Bush on Monday castigating the U.S. for a host of misdeeds. Iranian officials characterized the letter — which made only a passing reference to the country’s nuclear program — as a new opening to the U.S. American officials dismissed the letter, saying it didn’t address U.S. concerns about Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Latest news

The Truth of a Human Disaster in Iran

Equal participation of all the people in creating the law of a country is one of the main necessities...

Incompetency of Iran’s Politicians in Economy and a Suffering Country

Iranian politicians would be able to prevent any mistakes in the field of the economy if they would focus...

Rezaei Resigns as Secretary of the Expediency Council, Who Is His Replacement?

Mohsen Rezaei has resigned his position as Secretary of the Expediency Council of Iran after more than 20 years...

Real History of Iran’s ‘Holy Defense’

On September 22, 1980, the Iran-Iraq war began a war that was imposed by the regime’s first supreme leader...

Iran: Raisi’s UNGA Speech Filled With Lies and Support of Terrorism

The Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi gave his anticipated address to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on Tuesday, despite...

Iran Government’s Economic Crisis Has No Solution

Despite the Iranian government’s rumors of fighting and eliminating corruption, increasing the people’s wages, removing the subsidies of the...

Must read

Iran tied to closure of TV station in Iraq – report

Iran Focus: Baghdad, Sep. 09 – Iran may have...

Tony Blair: West should use force if Iran ‘continues to develop nuclear weapons’

The Guardian: The west should use force against Iran...

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you